<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Vamsi Gangavalli&#039;s Weblog &#187; samsung</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gangavalli.com/blog/tag/samsung/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gangavalli.com/blog</link>
	<description>its about life, blogging, google, seo, firefox and some cool things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:17:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung LED TV? Slimmer than the Slimmest?</title>
		<link>http://www.gangavalli.com/blog/2009/04/28/samsung-led-tv-slimmer-than-the-slimmest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gangavalli.com/blog/2009/04/28/samsung-led-tv-slimmer-than-the-slimmest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vamsi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gangavalli.com/blog/?p=399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought I read it wrong or it was a spelling mistake for LCD in an online advertisement that I spotted on Mashable.com But after I clicked the ad and reached Samsung Website page, it was evident that Samsung really meant LED TV. Well, I didn&#8217;t know there were LED TVs. Thickness: 1.2&#8243; These LED [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I read it wrong or it was a spelling mistake for LCD in an online advertisement that I spotted on Mashable.com</p>
<p><a title="Samsung LED TV Advertisement" href="http://www.gangavalli.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/samsung-led-tv1.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.gangavalli.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/samsung-led-tv-1.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>But after I clicked the ad and reached <a href="http://www.samsung.com/us/productsubtype/led/" target="_blank">Samsung Website page</a>, it was evident that Samsung really meant LED TV. Well, I didn&#8217;t know there were LED TVs.<br />
Thickness: 1.2&#8243;<br />
These LED TVs range from $2300 &#8211; $3800 (40&#8243; to 55&#8243;).<br />
I wish I own one of these ultra slims but my current slim fit Samsung TV (29&#8243;) is doing really well.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> These TVs were <a href="http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/4/24/business/3761711&amp;sec=business" target="_blank">recently launched</a>. Also to be <a href="http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/News-By-Industry/Cons-Products/Electronics/LED-TV-to-be-available-in-India/articleshow/4450572.cms" target="_blank">available in India</a> soon.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gangavalli.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F04%2F28%2Fsamsung-led-tv-slimmer-than-the-slimmest%2F&amp;title=Samsung%20LED%20TV%3F%20Slimmer%20than%20the%20Slimmest%3F" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://www.gangavalli.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gangavalli.com/blog/2009/04/28/samsung-led-tv-slimmer-than-the-slimmest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bought Samsung E880 Yesterday!</title>
		<link>http://www.gangavalli.com/blog/2005/11/30/bought-samsung-e880-yesterday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gangavalli.com/blog/2005/11/30/bought-samsung-e880-yesterday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vamsi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dairy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung e880]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung india]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gangavalli.com/blog/2005/11/30/bought-samsung-e880-yesterday/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally I have changed my mobile from my good old 2100 to Samsung E880. Samsung E880 details: &#8211; Official Samsung India Website &#8211; Complete details &#038; Specifications from GSM Arena Current price for Samsung E880 in India is Rs.13500/- Actually thought to go for Nokia 6600(price: Rs.9800) or LG 4410(price: Rs.14500) but after seeing the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 10px;"><img src='http://www.gangavalli.com/blog/files/samsunge880photo.jpg' alt='Samsung E880 Mobile' title='Samsung E880 Mobile'/></div>
<p>Finally I have changed my mobile from my good old 2100 to Samsung E880.</p>
<p>Samsung E880 details:<br />
 &#8211; <a href="http://in.samsungmobile.com/en//phone/phone_view/phone_feature.jsp?p_pfid_1=SGH-E880" target="_blank">Official Samsung India Website</a><br />
 &#8211; <a href="http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_e880-1143.php" target="_blank">Complete details &#038; Specifications from GSM Arena</a><br />
Current price for Samsung E880 in India is Rs.13500/-</p>
<p>Actually thought to go for Nokia 6600(price: Rs.9800) or LG 4410(price: Rs.14500) but after seeing the features in the showroom, decided with Samsung e880.<br />
I am satisfied with the phone overall but cannot review it because have&#8217;nt seen and used all the features yet. May be I will take atleast a month to see things in detail. One negative point I found about the phone is that it dosent have outspeaker to switch-on while answering a phone call except an extra attachable speaker accessory. </p>
<p>I have changed the stupid Hutch service now. I am really fed-up with the Hutch service because of its low signal and 303 messages which say &#8220;you have 2 missed calls. please send GET to see the numbers&#8221;. </p>
<p>I bought an Airtel Postpaid connection and managed to get the last 6 digits of my old number. Well, I am not giving out my number here because I dont want to be buzzed useless calls or home loan calls and personal loan calls. With the hutch number it became routine for me to answer atleat 2 calls from banks offering loans. So, I prefer little privacy now. I can give my contact number for those who really need it. Please use the <a href="http://www.gangavalli.com/blog/contact-me/">contact form</a> and ping me for the number.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gangavalli.com%2Fblog%2F2005%2F11%2F30%2Fbought-samsung-e880-yesterday%2F&amp;title=Bought%20Samsung%20E880%20Yesterday%21" id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://www.gangavalli.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gangavalli.com/blog/2005/11/30/bought-samsung-e880-yesterday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

